Forma urbana y movilidad sustentable: reflexiones sobre Montevideo.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18861/ania.2017.7.0.2851

Keywords:

Sustainable mobility, Urban form, Urban Planning in Montevideo.

Abstract

The following article reflects on the relationship between the built environment and mobility. Sustainable mobility, which prioritizes public transit and actives modes, has a starring role in the future of urban planning. In the literature, this relationship between urban form and mobility has been vastly studied. Several authors have established which variables of urban form affect mobility, and what can be done through design to foster sustainable mobility. Also, the relevance of attitudinal factors has been studied and how, if possible, citizens’ behavior could be affected in order to promote sustainable attitudes. Through the case of Montevideo, the relation between urban form and mobility will be exemplified. Also, the objectives and strategies of the city government’s plans will be analyzed and conclusions will be made according to the cited literature

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valentina Vincent, Universidad ORT Uruguay

Master in Science in Sustainable Urbanism, The Bartlett School of Planning, University College of London (Reino Unido). Arquitecta, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Profesora adjunta en Teoría y Práctica del Urbanismo, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Actividad profesional independiente.

References

BANISTER, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73-80.

BANISTER, D. (2011). Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, (19), 1538-1546.

BERVEJILLO, F. (2016). Informe de desarrollo urbano. Presentado por el Consorcio Artelia-Halcrow-Rhama-CSI para el Plan Director de Saneamiento y Drenaje Urbano de Montevideo (IM - División Desarrollo Ambiental - División Saneamiento). Montevideo: IM.

BOHTE, W., MAAT, K., & VAN WEE, B. (2009). Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: a review of theories and empirical research. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 325-357.

CAF. (2011). Desarrollo urbano y movilidad en América Latina. Caracas: CAF.

CERVERO, R.; & KOCKELMAN, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research, 2, 199–219.

DIELEMAN, F., DIJST, M., & BURGHOUWT, G. (2002). Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Studies, 39(3), 507–527.

EWING, R., & CERVERO, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 7(3), 265-294.

GUGLIELMETTI, R., TONI, M., RAHARJO, H., DI PIETRO, L., & PETROS, S. (2017). Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility? Journal of Cleaner Production, (174), 1566-1587.

HISELIUS, L.W., & ROSQVIST, L.S. (2015). Mobility management campaigns as part of the transition towards changing social norms on sustainable travel behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production (123), 34-41.

IM (1998). Plan Montevideo. Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial 1998 – 2005. Montevideo: IM.

IM (2010). Plan de Movilidad, hacia un sistema de movilidad accesible, democrático y eficiente 2010-2020. Montevideo: IM.

IM. (2012). Directrices Departamentales de Ordenamiento Territorial y Desarrollo Sostenible de Montevideo. Recuperado de: http://www.montevideo.gub.uy/institucional/politicas/directrices-departamentales-de-ordenamiento-territorial-y-desarrollo-sostenible-de-montevideo

IM (2013). Informe Censos 2011: Montevideo y Área Metropolitana. Recuperado desde http://www.montevideo.gub.uy/sites/default/files/informe_censos_2011_mdeo_y_area_metro.pdf

MAUTTONE, A., & HERNÁNDEZ, D. (2017). Encuesta de movilidad del área metropolitana de Montevideo. Principales resultados e indicadores (report). Montevideo: CAF, Intendencia de Montevideo, Intendencia de Canelones, Intendencia de San José, Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas, Universidad dela República, PNUD Uruguay.

NEWMAN, P; & KENWORTHY, J. (1991). Transport and urban form in thirty-two of the world’s principal cities. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 249-272.

NEWMAN, P; & KENWORTHY, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

PORTILLO, A. (2010). Vivienda y sociedad: La situación actual de la vivienda en Uruguay. Recuperado desde http://www.fadu.edu.uy/investigacion/files/2015/07/INVESTIGACION-DE-VIVIENDA-VERSION-ULTIMA-portillo-1.pdf

RUEDA, S. (2002). Modelos urbanos y sostenibilidad. En I Congreso de Ingeniería Civil, Territorio y Medio ambiente, Madrid. Recuperado desde http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd30/modelos.pdf

UN. (2013). Streets as public spaces and drivers of urban prosperity. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. UNDP URUGUAY. (2012). Políticas de tiempo, movilidad y transporte público: rasgos básicos, equidad social y de género. Recuperado

desde http://www.uy.undp.org/content/uruguay/es/home/library/poverty/publication_1.html

VASCONCELLOS, E. A., & MENDONÇA, A. (2016). Observatorio de Movilidad Urbana: Informe 2015-2016. (resumen ejecutivo). Caracas: CAF. Recuperado desde http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/981

Published

2018-10-01

How to Cite

Vincent, V. (2018). Forma urbana y movilidad sustentable: reflexiones sobre Montevideo. Anales De Investigación En Arquitectura, 7, 97–119. https://doi.org/10.18861/ania.2017.7.0.2851

Issue

Section

Original papers

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.