Projetando a Coexistência Urbana
Desafiando o especismo por espaços equitativos além dos limites humanos.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18861/ania.2024.14.1.3762Palavras-chave:
Convivência, justiça mais que humana, design multiespécies, arquitetura ecológica, separação humano-natureza, aceitação social, especismo, vida selvagem urbana, habitats urbanos, conviver com a naturezaResumo
Este ensaio examina criticamente os paradigmas predominantes de justiça ambiental e espacial, enfatizando as disparidades existentes em políticas que predominantemente favorecem os interesses humanos, enquanto negligenciam os direitos fundamentais e o bem-estar das espécies não humanas. Apesar do crescente reconhecimento da importância de estabelecer uma conexão mais profunda entre os atores humanos e não humanos para o bem-estar geral, uma mentalidade pervasiva de especismo persiste, afastando os humanos do amplo mundo natural. Esta separação da natureza influencia profundamente a formulação de políticas e justiça, estabelecendo um viés que se concentra principalmente nas preocupações humanas e nas condições ambientais adaptadas ao bem-estar humano. Arquitetos e planejadores, apesar de possuírem o potencial para enriquecer habitats para várias espécies, frequentemente adotam abordagens centradas no ser humano que marginalizam entidades que não são humanas, restringindo seu acesso aos arredores imediatos dos territórios humanos e impedindo oportunidades para experiências imersivas na natureza. Este artigo defende uma mudança abrangente de paradigma nas práticas arquitetônicas, instando a uma abordagem mais inclusiva e equitativa que estenda a justiça espacial e ambiental para abranger as diversas necessidades e direitos tanto das espécies humanas como não humanas dentro do cenário urbano. As conclusões destacam a urgente necessidade de os arquitetos e planejadores reavaliarem suas abordagens, promovendo um ambiente que apoie a coexistência e reconheça a interconexão de todas as espécies. Diante das preocupações globais com a biodiversidade e dos frameworks internacionais como o Marco Global de Biodiversidade Kunming-Montreal, este ensaio contribui para o discurso sobre práticas de design sustentável e ético, defendendo um futuro em que a justiça espacial e ambiental amplie seu alcance além dos limites da experiência humana para criar uma coexistência respeitosa e justa com toda a comunidade ecológica.
Downloads
Referências
Apfelbeck, B., Jakoby, C., Hanusch, M., Steffani, E. B., Hauck, T. E., & Weisser, W. W. (2019). A Conceptual Framework for Choosing Target Species for Wildlife-Inclusive Urban Design. Sustainability, 11(24), 6972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246972
Bauer, N., & von Atzigen, A. (2019). Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding. In S. M. Durant, N. Pettorelli, & J. T. du Toit (Eds.), Rewilding (pp. 142–164). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560962.008
Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature Into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press.
Bekoff, M. (2013). Who lives, who dies, and why?: How speciesism undermines compassionate conservation and social justice. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 15–26). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.004
Bekoff, M. (2014). Rewilding our hearts: Building pathways of compassion and coexistence. New World Library.
Braito, M., Böck, K., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Muhar, S., & Penker, M. (2017). Human-Nature Relationships and Linkages to Environmental Behaviour. Environmental Values, 26. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14913285800706
Brownlow, A. (2000). A wolf in the garden: Ideology and change in the Adirondack landscape. In Animal Spaces, Beastly Places. Routledge.
Caffo, L. (2017). Fragile umanità: Il postumano contemporaneo. Giulio Einaudi editore. Translation by Vegezzi Filippo. Original version: "nelle nostre vite quotidiane, semplicemente, gli animali non esistono."
Canepa, M., Mosca, F., Barath, S., Changenet, A., Hauck, T. E., Ludwig, F., Roccotiello, E., Pianta, M., Selvan, S. U., Vogler, V., & Perini, K. (2022). Ecolopes, beyond greening. A multi-species approach for urban design. AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 11, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11212022
Catalano, C., Meslec, M., Boileau, J., Guarino, R., Aurich, I., Baumann, N., Chartier, F., Dalix, P., Deramond, S., Laube, P., & others. (2021). Smart sustainable cities of the new millennium: Towards design for nature. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(3), 1053–1086.
CBD. (2022, December 19). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Connference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, Montreal.
Clarke, R., Heitlinger, S., Light, A., Forlano, L., Foth, M., & DiSalvo, C. (2019). More-than-human participation: Design for sustainable smart city futures. Interactions, 26(3), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319075
Clayton, S. (2019). The psychology of rewilding. In S. M. Durant, N. Pettorelli, & J. T. du Toit (Eds.), Rewilding (pp. 182–200). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560962.010
Clément, G. (2015). L’alternativa ambiente. Quodlibet.
Corbey, R., & Lanjouw, A. (2013). The Politics of Species: Reshaping Our Relationships with Other Animals. Cambridge University Press.
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Descola, P., Lloyd, J., & Sahlins, M. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N. D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, N., Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., Noss, R., Hansen, M., Locke, H., Ellis, E. C., Jones, B., Barber, C. V., Hayes, R., Kormos, C., Martin, V., Crist, E., … Saleem, M. (2017). An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm. BioScience, 67(6), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. OUP Oxford.
Dunayer, J. (2013). The rights of sentient beings: Moving beyond old and new speciesism. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 27–39). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.005
Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J., & Bekessy, S. A. (2018). Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design. Conservation Letters, 11(2), e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12411
Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1993). Human, habitat, and aesthetic. In The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 15–28). Island Press.
Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2018). Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory. Planning Theory, 17(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042
Ives, C. D., Lentini, P. E., Threlfall, C. G., Ikin, K., Shanahan, D. F., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Fuller, R. A., Mumaw, L., Rayner, L., Rowe, R., Valentine, L. E., & Kendal, D. (2016). Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12404
Kay, C. A. M., Rohnke, A. T., Sander, H. A., Stankowich, T., Fidino, M., Murray, M. H., Lewis, J. S., Taves, I., Lehrer, E. W., Zellmer, A. J., Schell, C. J., & Magle, S. B. (2021). Barriers to building wildlife‐inclusive cities: Insights from the deliberations of urban ecologists, urban planners and landscape designers. People and Nature, pan3.10283. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10283
Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
Kueffer, C., Di Giulio, M., Hauser, K., & Wiedmer, C. (2020). Time for a biodiversity turn in sustainability science. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(4), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.4.14
Louv, R. (2019). Our wild calling: How connecting with animals can transform our lives; and save theirs. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
Magle, S. B. (2017). Building the civilized wild. In Wildness: Relations of People and Place. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226444970.001.0001
Pett, T. J., Shwartz, A., Irvine, K. N., Dallimer, M., & Davies, Z. G. (2016). Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework. BioScience, 66(7), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw036
Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (2000). Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: An Introduction. In Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: Ney geographies of human-animal relations (pp. 1–34). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203004883
Pilgrim, S. E., Cullen, L. C., Smith, D. J., & Pretty, J. (2008). Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(4), 1004–1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070837v
Pyle, R. M. (1993). The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland. Houghton Mifflin.
Pyle, R. M. (2017). Conundrum and continuum. One man’s Wilderness, from a Ditch to the Dark Divide. In Wildness: Relations of people & place (pp. 12–23).
Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., & Collado, S. (2018). Nature Experiences and Adults’ Self-Reported Pro-environmental Behaviors: The Role of Connectedness to Nature and Childhood Nature Experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
Rosenzweig, M. (2003). Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press.
Ryder, R. D. (2010). Speciesism again: The original leaflet. Critical Society, 2(1), 2.
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research, 42(7), 541. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14229
Sterba, J. (2012). Nature wars: The incredible story of how wildlife comebacks turned backyards into battlegrounds (1st ed). Crown Publishers.
Stryker, J. (2013). Afterword. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 246–248). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.026
Turrini, T., & Knop, E. (2015). A landscape ecology approach identifies important drivers of urban biodiversity. Global Change Biology, 21(4), 1652–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12825
Vegezzi, F. (2021). Urban AgroEcosystem Network UAEN - Agroecological frameworks for the Barcelona city transition toward biocity. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23450.93127
Weisser, W. W., & Hauck, T. E. (2017). ANIMAL-AIDED DESIGN – using a species’ life-cycle to improve open space planning and conservation in cities and elsewhere [Preprint]. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/150359
Weisser, W. W., Hensel, M., Barath, S., Culshaw, V., Grobman, Y. J., Hauck, T. E., Joschinski, J., Ludwig, F., Mimet, A., Perini, K., Roccotiello, E., Schloter, M., Shwartz, A., Hensel, D. S., & Vogler, V. (2023). Creating ecologically sound buildings by integrating ecology, architecture and computational design. People and Nature, 5(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10411
Werner, P., & Zahner, R. (2010). Urban Patterns and Biological Diversity: A Review. In Urban Biodiversity and Design (pp. 145–173). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318654.ch7
Wilkes-Allemann, J., van der Velde, R., Kopp, M., Bernasconi, A., Karaca, E., Coleman Brantschen, E., Cepic, S., Tomićević, J., Bauer, N., Petit-Boix, A., Cueva, J., Živojinović, I., Leipold, S., & Saha, S. (2022). Research Agenda -Biocities of the future. https://doi.org/10.36333/rs4
Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Filippo Vegezzi
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
El contenido de los artículos publicados es responsabilidad exclusiva de sus autores y no reflejan necesariamente las opiniones del Comité Editorial, ni de los evaluadores.
La revista Anales de Investigación en Arquitectura preserva los derechos de los autores, que son adoptados por Comité Editorial para su publicación. Los autores declaran que el trabajo presentado es inédito y no ha sido publicado en una revista científica o en una monografía.
La revista Anales de Investigación en Arquitectura proporciona un acceso abierto a sus contenidos, basados en el principio de la licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International License, que ofrece al público un acceso libre a las investigaciones para ayudar a un mayor intercambio global del conocimiento.
