Diseñando la coexistencia urbana

Desafiando el especismo por espacios equitativos más allá de los límites humanos

Autores/as

  • Filippo Vegezzi Coharc Studio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18861/ania.2024.14.1.3762

Palabras clave:

Convivencia, justicia más-que-humana, diseño multiespecies, arquitectura ecológica, separación humano-naturaleza, aceptación social, especismo, fauna urbana, hábitats urbanos, convivir con la naturaleza

Resumen

Este artículo examina críticamente los paradigmas predominantes de justicia ambiental y espacial, enfatizando las disparidades existentes en políticas que predominantemente favorecen los intereses humanos mientras pasan por alto los derechos fundamentales y el bienestar de las especies no humanas. A pesar del creciente reconocimiento de la importancia de establecer una conexión más profunda entre los actores humanos y no humanos para el bienestar general, persiste una mentalidad de especismo pervasiva que distancia a los humanos del mundo natural más amplio. Esta separación de la naturaleza influye profundamente en la formulación de políticas y justicia, estableciendo un sesgo que se centra principalmente en las preocupaciones humanas y en las condiciones ambientales adaptadas al bienestar humano. A pesar de poseer el potencial para enriquecer hábitats para diversas especies, arquitectos y planificadores adoptan frecuentemente enfoques centrados en el ser humano que marginan entidades que no son humanas, restringiendo su acceso a los alrededores inmediatos de los territorios humanos e impidiendo oportunidades para experiencias inmersivas en la naturaleza. Este artículo aboga por un cambio de paradigma integral en las prácticas arquitectónicas, instando a un enfoque más inclusivo y equitativo que extienda la justicia espacial y ambiental para abarcar las diversas necesidades y derechos de las especies humanas y no humanas dentro del paisaje urbano. Las conclusiones subrayan la urgente necesidad de que arquitectos y planificadores reevalúen sus enfoques, fomentando un entorno que apoye la coexistencia y reconozca la interconexión de todas las especies. Frente a preocupaciones globales sobre la biodiversidad y marcos internacionales como el Marco Global de Biodiversidad Kunming-Montreal, esta investigación contribuye al discurso sobre prácticas de diseño sostenible y ético, abogando por un futuro donde la justicia espacial y ambiental amplíe su alcance más allá de los límites de la experiencia humana para crear una coexistencia respetuosa y justa con toda la comunidad ecológica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Apfelbeck, B., Jakoby, C., Hanusch, M., Steffani, E. B., Hauck, T. E., & Weisser, W. W. (2019). A Conceptual Framework for Choosing Target Species for Wildlife-Inclusive Urban Design. Sustainability, 11(24), 6972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246972

Bauer, N., & von Atzigen, A. (2019). Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding. In S. M. Durant, N. Pettorelli, & J. T. du Toit (Eds.), Rewilding (pp. 142–164). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560962.008

Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature Into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press.

Bekoff, M. (2013). Who lives, who dies, and why?: How speciesism undermines compassionate conservation and social justice. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 15–26). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.004

Bekoff, M. (2014). Rewilding our hearts: Building pathways of compassion and coexistence. New World Library.

Braito, M., Böck, K., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Muhar, S., & Penker, M. (2017). Human-Nature Relationships and Linkages to Environmental Behaviour. Environmental Values, 26. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14913285800706

Brownlow, A. (2000). A wolf in the garden: Ideology and change in the Adirondack landscape. In Animal Spaces, Beastly Places. Routledge.

Caffo, L. (2017). Fragile umanità: Il postumano contemporaneo. Giulio Einaudi editore. Translation by Vegezzi Filippo. Original version: "nelle nostre vite quotidiane, semplicemente, gli animali non esistono."

Canepa, M., Mosca, F., Barath, S., Changenet, A., Hauck, T. E., Ludwig, F., Roccotiello, E., Pianta, M., Selvan, S. U., Vogler, V., & Perini, K. (2022). Ecolopes, beyond greening. A multi-species approach for urban design. AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 11, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/11212022

Catalano, C., Meslec, M., Boileau, J., Guarino, R., Aurich, I., Baumann, N., Chartier, F., Dalix, P., Deramond, S., Laube, P., & others. (2021). Smart sustainable cities of the new millennium: Towards design for nature. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(3), 1053–1086.

CBD. (2022, December 19). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Connference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, Montreal.

Clarke, R., Heitlinger, S., Light, A., Forlano, L., Foth, M., & DiSalvo, C. (2019). More-than-human participation: Design for sustainable smart city futures. Interactions, 26(3), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319075

Clayton, S. (2019). The psychology of rewilding. In S. M. Durant, N. Pettorelli, & J. T. du Toit (Eds.), Rewilding (pp. 182–200). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560962.010

Clément, G. (2015). L’alternativa ambiente. Quodlibet.

Corbey, R., & Lanjouw, A. (2013). The Politics of Species: Reshaping Our Relationships with Other Animals. Cambridge University Press.

Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.

Descola, P., Lloyd, J., & Sahlins, M. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.

Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N. D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, N., Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., Noss, R., Hansen, M., Locke, H., Ellis, E. C., Jones, B., Barber, C. V., Hayes, R., Kormos, C., Martin, V., Crist, E., … Saleem, M. (2017). An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm. BioScience, 67(6), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014

Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. OUP Oxford.

Dunayer, J. (2013). The rights of sentient beings: Moving beyond old and new speciesism. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 27–39). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.005

Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J., & Bekessy, S. A. (2018). Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design. Conservation Letters, 11(2), e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12411

Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1993). Human, habitat, and aesthetic. In The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 15–28). Island Press.

Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2018). Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory. Planning Theory, 17(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042

Ives, C. D., Lentini, P. E., Threlfall, C. G., Ikin, K., Shanahan, D. F., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Fuller, R. A., Mumaw, L., Rayner, L., Rowe, R., Valentine, L. E., & Kendal, D. (2016). Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12404

Kay, C. A. M., Rohnke, A. T., Sander, H. A., Stankowich, T., Fidino, M., Murray, M. H., Lewis, J. S., Taves, I., Lehrer, E. W., Zellmer, A. J., Schell, C. J., & Magle, S. B. (2021). Barriers to building wildlife‐inclusive cities: Insights from the deliberations of urban ecologists, urban planners and landscape designers. People and Nature, pan3.10283. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10283

Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913

Kueffer, C., Di Giulio, M., Hauser, K., & Wiedmer, C. (2020). Time for a biodiversity turn in sustainability science. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(4), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.4.14

Louv, R. (2019). Our wild calling: How connecting with animals can transform our lives; and save theirs. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.

Magle, S. B. (2017). Building the civilized wild. In Wildness: Relations of People and Place. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226444970.001.0001

Pett, T. J., Shwartz, A., Irvine, K. N., Dallimer, M., & Davies, Z. G. (2016). Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework. BioScience, 66(7), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw036

Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (2000). Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: An Introduction. In Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: Ney geographies of human-animal relations (pp. 1–34). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203004883

Pilgrim, S. E., Cullen, L. C., Smith, D. J., & Pretty, J. (2008). Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(4), 1004–1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070837v

Pyle, R. M. (1993). The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland. Houghton Mifflin.

Pyle, R. M. (2017). Conundrum and continuum. One man’s Wilderness, from a Ditch to the Dark Divide. In Wildness: Relations of people & place (pp. 12–23).

Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., & Collado, S. (2018). Nature Experiences and Adults’ Self-Reported Pro-environmental Behaviors: The Role of Connectedness to Nature and Childhood Nature Experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055

Rosenzweig, M. (2003). Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press.

Ryder, R. D. (2010). Speciesism again: The original leaflet. Critical Society, 2(1), 2.

Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225

Soulsbury, C. D., & White, P. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research, 42(7), 541. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14229

Sterba, J. (2012). Nature wars: The incredible story of how wildlife comebacks turned backyards into battlegrounds (1st ed). Crown Publishers.

Stryker, J. (2013). Afterword. In R. Corbey & A. Lanjouw (Eds.), The Politics of Species: Reshaping our Relationships with Other Animals (pp. 246–248). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139506755.026

Turrini, T., & Knop, E. (2015). A landscape ecology approach identifies important drivers of urban biodiversity. Global Change Biology, 21(4), 1652–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12825

Vegezzi, F. (2021). Urban AgroEcosystem Network UAEN - Agroecological frameworks for the Barcelona city transition toward biocity. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23450.93127

Weisser, W. W., & Hauck, T. E. (2017). ANIMAL-AIDED DESIGN – using a species’ life-cycle to improve open space planning and conservation in cities and elsewhere [Preprint]. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/150359

Weisser, W. W., Hensel, M., Barath, S., Culshaw, V., Grobman, Y. J., Hauck, T. E., Joschinski, J., Ludwig, F., Mimet, A., Perini, K., Roccotiello, E., Schloter, M., Shwartz, A., Hensel, D. S., & Vogler, V. (2023). Creating ecologically sound buildings by integrating ecology, architecture and computational design. People and Nature, 5(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10411

Werner, P., & Zahner, R. (2010). Urban Patterns and Biological Diversity: A Review. In Urban Biodiversity and Design (pp. 145–173). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318654.ch7

Wilkes-Allemann, J., van der Velde, R., Kopp, M., Bernasconi, A., Karaca, E., Coleman Brantschen, E., Cepic, S., Tomićević, J., Bauer, N., Petit-Boix, A., Cueva, J., Živojinović, I., Leipold, S., & Saha, S. (2022). Research Agenda -Biocities of the future. https://doi.org/10.36333/rs4

Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. Liveright Publishing Corporation.

Publicado

09.05.2024

Cómo citar

Vegezzi, F. (2024). Diseñando la coexistencia urbana: Desafiando el especismo por espacios equitativos más allá de los límites humanos. Anales De Investigación En Arquitectura, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.18861/ania.2024.14.1.3762

Número

Sección

Dossier: Justicia espacial

Artículos similares

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.