¿Contenido o datos generados por el usuario?
Las dinámicas (in)voluntarias de generación de contenido en línea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2025.20.1.3954Palabras clave:
datificación, redes sociales, Contenido Generado por Usuario, datos generados por el usuario, privacidadResumen
La creciente datificación y la generación involuntaria de datos simplemente por interactuar, con distintos grados de conciencia, con la diversidad de plataformas sociales digitales, exige una revisión del concepto Contenido Generado por el Usuario (CGU). En este sentido, se propone el concepto de Datos Generados por el Usuario (DGU), basado en una idea frecuentemente usada pero escasamente discutida en la literatura académica, y se aborda de qué manera los rastros digitales dejados por los usuarios son capturados y procesados por terceros. A continuación, se realiza una crítica que distingue y delimita las nociones de DGU y la definición de CGU, sosteniendo que constituyen dos ramas de investigación distintas a partir de las cuales se puede pensar la generación de contenido en línea.
Descargas
Citas
Allan, S. (2007). Citizen Journalism and the Rise of ‘Mass Self-Communication’: Reporting the London Bombings. Global Media Journal - Australian Edition, 1(1), 1-20.
Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544-1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
Cadwalladr C. & Graham-Harrison E. (2018). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P.S. & Sun, L. (2023). A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. ArXiv, 37(4),1-44. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.04226
Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. & Sun, L. (2025). A Survey of AI-Generated content (AIGC). ACM Computing Surveys, 57(5), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3704262
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y Poder. Alianza Editorial.
Chadwick, A. & Howard, P. N. (2009). Introduction: New directions in Internet politics research. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard. (eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (1-12). Routledge.
Charitsis, V. & Laamanen, M. (2022). When digital capitalism takes (on) the neighbourhood: data activism meets place-based collective action. Social Movement Studies, 23(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123314
Chen, C., Wu, Z., Lai, Y., Ou, W., Liao, T. & Zheng, Z. (2023). Challenges and remedies to privacy and security in AIGC: Exploring the potential of privacy computing, blockchain, and beyond. ArXiv, 37(4),1-43. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.00419
Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Ordinary witnessing in post-television news: Towards a new moral imagination. Critical discourse studies, 7(4), 305-319.
Gillmor, D. (2010). Mediactive. Dan Gillmor.
Herrada, N., Santos, M. & Barbosa, S. (2024). Affordances-driven ethics for research on mobile instant messaging: Notes from the Global South. Mobile Media & Communication, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241247994
Jia, L. & Ruan, L. (2020). Going global: Comparing Chinese mobile applications’ data and user privacy governance at home and abroad. Internet Policy Review, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1502
Johns, A. (2020). ‘This will be the WhatsApp election’: Crypto-publics and digital citizenship in Malaysia’s GE14 election. First Monday, 25(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10381
Johns, A., Matamoros-Fernández, A. & Baulch, E. (2024). WhatsApp: From a One-to-one Messaging App to a Global Communication Platform. John Wiley & Sons.
Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Kargar, S. & McManamen, K. (2018). Censorship and collateral damage: analyzing the Telegram ban in Iran. Berkman Klein Center. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publication/2018/censorship-and-collateral-damage
Liu, Y., Du, H., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Miao, C., Shen, X. & Jamalipour, A. (2023). Blockchain-Empowered Lifecycle Management for AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Products in Edge Networks. ArXiv, 6(1), 1-9. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.02836
Milan, S. & Treré, E. (2021). Big Data From the South(s): An Analytical Matrix to Investigate Data at the Margins. In D. Rohlinger & S. Sobieraj (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Digital Media (pp. 1-21). Oxford University Press.
Olson, P. (2014). Facebook closes $19 billion WhatsApp deal. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/10/06/facebook-closes-19-billion-whatsapp-deal/
Pellegrino, G., Söderberg, J. & Milan, S. (2019). Datafication from Below: Epistemology, Ambivalences, Challenges. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17431
Peng, S. (2024). Datafication and Data Flows. In International Economic Law in the Era of Datafication (pp. 195-243). Cambridge University Press.
Reading, A. (2009). Mobile witnessing: ethics and the camera phone in the ‘war on terror’, Globalizations, 6(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730802692435
Rieder, B., Abdulla, R., Poell, T., Woltering, R. & Zack L. (2015). Data critique and analytical opportunities for very large Facebook Pages: Lessons learned from exploring “We are all Khaled Said”. Big Data & Society, 2(2). https://doi-org.pucdechile.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/2053951715614980
Risso, L. (2018). Harvesting Your Soul? Cambridge Analytica and Brexit. In Jansohn, C. (ed.), The Selected Proceedings of the Symposium Brexit means Brexit? (pp. 75-90). Akademie der Wissenschaen und der Literatur, Mainz.
Ryan, F., Fritz, A. & Impiombato, D. (2020). Front Matter. In TikTok and WeChat: Curating and controlling global information flows (p. [i]-01). Australian Strategic Policy Institute. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26120.1
Santos, M. (2022) The ‘so-called’ UGC: An updated definition of User-Generated Content in the age of Social Media. Online Information Review, 46(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0258
Santos, M. (2023). Politicizing witnessing: Testimonial user-generated content in the aftermath of Rousseff’s impeachment in Brazil. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 29(6), 1517-1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231164760
Santos, M., Saldaña, M. & Tsyganova, K. (2024). Subversive Affordances as a Form of Digital Transnational Activism: The case of Telegram’s Native Proxy. New Media & Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211054830
Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D. & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2021). From user-generated data to data-driven innovation: A research agenda to understand user privacy in digital markets. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102331
Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D. & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2023). Privacy concerns in social media UGC communities: Understanding user behavior sentiments in complex networks. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 23, 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00631-5
Segura, M. S. & Waisbord, S. (2019). Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship. Television & New Media, 20(4), 412-419. https://doi-org.pucdechile.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1527476419834519
Setzer, V. W. (2004). Dado, informação, conhecimento e competência. Folha Educação, 27, 6-7. https://www.ime.usp.br/~vwsetzer/dado-info-Folha.html
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Quandt, T. (2018). Dark Participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519
Treré, E. (2020). The banality of WhatsApp: On the everyday politics of backstage activism in Mexico and Spain. First Monday, 25(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10404
van der Vlist, F. N. & Helmond, A. (2021). How partners mediate platform power: Mapping business and data partnerships in the social media ecosystem. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211025061
van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, and Society, 31(1), 41.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Wang, T., Zhang, Y., Qi, S., Zhao, R., Xia, Z. & Weng, J. (2023). Security and privacy on generative data in AIGC: A survey. ACM Comput, 1(1). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.09435
Wardle, C., Dubberley, S. & Brown, P. (2014). Amateur footage: a global study of user-generated content in TV and online news output. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. A Tow/Knight Report, http://usergeneratednews.towcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Tow-Center-UGC-Report.pdf
Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-november-2017/1680764666
Williams, A., Wardle, C. & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2011). “Have they got news for us?” Audience revolution or business as usual at the BBC? Journalism Practice, 5(1), 85-99.
Wu, J., Gan, W., Chen, Z., Wan, S. & Lin, H. (2023). Ai-generated content (AIGC): A survey. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.06632
Wunsch-Vincent, S. & Vickery, G. (2007). Participative Web and User–Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2007/09/participative-web-and-user-created-content_g1gh826c/9789264037472-en.pdf
Zimmer, M. (2018). Addressing conceptual gaps in big data research ethics: An application of contextual integrity. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768300
