Un viaje prolongado

Luto y resurrección digital en el contexto chino

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2025.20.2.4112

Palabras clave:

luto, resurrección digital, China, re-socialización, rostro, cara

Resumen

Este artículo examina la evolución de las dinámicas de las prácticas de duelo en el contexto chino, enfatizando el papel de las tecnologías digitales impulsadas por inteligencia artificial (IA) en la resocialización de los fallecidos. Basándonos en el concepto de rendimiento mediacional (Bauman, 2004) como una característica fundamental de la autoridad vernácula, exploramos cómo la resurrección digital a través de chatbots y avatares media la relación entre los vivos y el más allá al resocializar a los fallecidos. La llegada de estas tecnologías introduce un cambio paradigmático, ya que los avatares impulsados por IA replican los roles sociales del difunto, generando una presencia inquietante que reencanta los rituales de duelo. Este reencanto se fundamenta en el sacrificio del rostro social (el rol del fallecido), produciendo finalmente la ilusión de una cara auténtica. La mencionada agencia posibilita una resurrección digital del individuo fallecido que, aunque genera una ilusión de continuidad, plantea riesgos para la integridad y fluidez de la memoria cultural. Este proceso interviene en la interacción dinámica entre pasado y presente mediante simulaciones algorítmicas, lo que impulsa una reevaluación crítica acerca de los mecanismos mediante los cuales se construye y legitima la autoridad vernacular.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Giustina Benedetta Baron, Turin – Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy

PhD –candidate– in Semiotics and Religious Studies, Italian Doctoral School of Religious Studies, with a scholarship from the Università degli Studi di Torino (Italy). Also pursuing a co-tutelle with Tartu Ülikool (Estonia).

Hongjin Song, Tartu – Tartu Ülikool, Estonia

Hongjin Song is a PhD student and a junior research fellow on semiotics and culture theory in the Department of semiotics, University of Tartu, Estonia. His research interest is centered on collective memories, power relationships, and social discourses. His research currently focuses on a semiotic understanding of the rumour phenomenon. hongjin.song@ut.ee

Citas

Accardi, M. & Prewitt R. (2023). Cultural Necromancy: Digital Resurrection and Hegemonic Incorporation. SubStance, 52(2), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2023.a907150

Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory. In Erll, A. & Nünning, A. (Eds.), Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 109-118.). Walter de Gruyter.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.

Barthes, R. (2010). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Hill and Wang.

Bauman, R. (2004). A World of Others’ Words: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality. Blackwell Publishing.

Bauman, R. (2008). The Philology of the Vernacular. Journal of Folklore Research, 45(1), 29-36.

Cheng, K. Y. (2025). The Law of Digital Afterlife: The Chinese Experience of AI ‘Resurrection’ and ‘Grief Tech’. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 33(1), eaae029. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae029

Chinese Text Project. (n.d.). Xunzi. Chinese Text Project. https://ctext.org/xunzi/ens

Chow, A. Y. M. (2017). Death in the Family – Bereavement and Mourning in Contemporary China. In Zang, X. & Zhao, L. X. (Eds.), Handbook on the Family and Marriage in China (pp. 373-391). Edward Elgar.

Clarke, A. C. (1973). Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible. Gollancz.

Cowan, D. E. (2005). Online U‑Topia: Cyberspace and the Mythology of Placelessness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 257-263.

Dawson, L. L. (2000). Researching Religion in Cyberspace: Issues and Strategies. In Hadden, J. K. & Cowan, D. E. (Eds.), Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises (pp. 25-54). JAI.

Durkheim, E. (1912) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Alcan.

Fabbri, P. & Marcarino, A. (2020). Il Discorso Politico. DeSignis, 33, 23-36.

Fabbri, P. (2018). “La Prima Vittima della Guerra è la Verità”. Interview with Paolo Fabbri. Semiotica online. www.paolofabbri.it/interviste/primera_victima_guerra/

Frazer, J. G. (1976). The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings (Vol. 1). The Macmillan Press.

Fu, C. & Glasdam, S. (2022). The ‘Good Death’ in Mainland China: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 4, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100069

Gramigna, R. (2024). Preserving Anonymity: Deep‑Fake as an Identity‑Protection Device and as a Digital Camouflage. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 37(3), 729-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10079-y

Henrickson, L. (2023). Chatting with the Dead: The Hermeneutics of Thanabots. Media, Culture & Society, 45(5), 949-966. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221147626

Hoover, S. M. (Ed.). (2016). Introduction. In The Media and Religious Authority (pp. 1-11). Penn State University Press.

Howard, R. G. (2013). Vernacular Authority: Critically Engaging ‘Tradition.’ In Blank, T. J. & Howard, R. G. (Eds.), Tradition in the Twenty-First Century: Locating the Role of the Past in the Present (pp. 72-99). Utah State University Press.

Hsu, C.-Y., O’Connor, M. & Lee, S. (2009). Understandings of Death and Dying for People of Chinese Origin. Death Studies, 33(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180802440431

Hurtado, H. (2017). Postmortal Society: Towards a Sociology of Immortality. Routledge.

Hurtado, J. (2022). Envisioning Postmortal Futures: Six Archetypes on Future Societal Approaches to Seeking Immortality. Mortality, 29(1), 18-36.

Kang, C. & Hongbing, Y. (2022). A Lotmanian Semiotic Interpretation of Cultural Memory in Ritual. Semiotica, 245, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0085

Khiun, L. K. (2016). Shadow and Soul: Stereoscopic Phantasmagoria and Holographic Immortalization in Transnational Chinese Pop. In Lim, S. S. & Soriano, C. R. R. (Eds.), Asian Perspectives on Digital Culture: Emerging Phenomena, Enduring Concepts (pp. 152-168). Routledge.

Kull, K., Emmeche, C. & Hoffmeyer, J. (2011). Why Biosemiotics? An Introduction to Our View on the Biology of Life Itself. In Emmeche, C. & Kull, K. (Eds.), Towards a Semiotic Biology (pp. 1-21). Imperial College Press.

Lachmann, R. (2008). Mnemonic and Intertextual Aspects of Literature. In Erll, A. & Nünning, A. (Eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 301-310). Walter de Gruyter.

Leone, M. (2011). Motility, Potentiality, Infinity: A Semiotics Hypothesis on Nature and Religion. Biosemiotics, 5, 369–389.

Lepik, P. (2002). On Universalism in Connection with the Interpretation of Magic in the Semiotics of Juri Lotman. Sign Systems Studies, 30(2), 555-576.

Lotman, J. M. & Uspenskij, B. A. (1988). Myth—Name— Culture. In Lucid, D. P. (Ed.), Soviet Semiotics: An Anthology (pp. 233-252). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lotman, J. M. (1984). “Agreement” and “Self‑Giving” as Archetypal Models of Culture. In The Semiotics of Russian Culture (pp. 125-140). University of Michigan Press.

Lotman, J. M. (1988). The Semiotics of Culture and the Concept of a Text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405260352

Mauss, M. (1904). L’origine des pouvoirs magiques dans les sociétés australiennes. En Œuvres. 2. Représentations collectives et diversité des civilisations (pp. 319-369). Les Éditions de Minuit.

Nöth, W. (1990). Semiotics of Magic. In Koch, W. A. (Ed.), Aspekte Einer Kultursemiotik, Universitätsverlag (pp. 141-163). Bochum.

Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1-6). Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 7-8). Harvard University Press.

Primiano, L. N. (1995). Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious Folklife. Western Folklore, 54(1), 37.56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499910

Rodríguez Reséndiz, H. & Reséndiz, J. R. (2024). Digital Resurrection: Challenging the Boundary between Life and Death with Artificial Intelligence. Philosophies, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030071

Schechner, R. (2022). Ritual and Performance. Taylor & Francis.

Setterson Jr., R. A., (2002). Socialization in the Life Course: New Frontiers in Theory and Research. In Settersten Jr., R. A. & Owens, T. J. (editors), Advances in Life Course Research (pp. 13-40). JAI Press.

Sherlock, A. (2013). Larger Than Life: Digital Resurrection and the Re‑Enchantment of Society. The Information Society, 29(3), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777302

Shuang, L. (1993). The Funeral and Chinese Culture. The Journal of Popular Culture, 27(2),113-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1993.113555.x

Song, H. (2022). A Wailing Wall in Cyberspace: Loneliness, Censorship, and Collective Memory – In Memory of Dr. Li Wenliang. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, 5, 103-125. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.22.5.6

Tambiah, S. J. (1999). Magic, Science, Religion and the Scope of Rationality. Cambridge University Press.

Tu, H. (2022). Long Live Chairman Mao! Death, Resurrection, and the (Un)Making of a Revolutionary Relic. The Journal of Asian Studies, 81(3), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911821002321

Tylor (1871) Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. Murray.

Valk, Ü. (2022). An Introduction to Vernacular Knowledge. In Valk, Ü. & Bowman, M. (Eds.), Vernacular Knowledge: Contesting Authority, Expressing Beliefs (pp. 1-21). Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Viola, M. (2024). Masked Faces: A Tale of Functional Redeployment between Biology and Material Culture. In Leone, M. (Ed.), The Hybrid Face: Paradoxes of the Visage in the Digital Era (pp. 1-21). Routledge / FACETS Advances in Face Studies.

Wang, J. X. Y. N., & Hairuo, J. (2024). Tasting Loss. In Lim, y. & Lye, K . Y. (Eds.), Reading Violence and Trauma in Asia and the World (pp. 202-212). Routledge.

Wang, Q. (2024). “AI gives the impression of life after death: Technology developed to provide comfort to the grieving time of emotional stress”. China Daily. AI gives impression of life after death - Chinadaily.com.cn

Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Zheng, R., Yue, X. & Dong, F. (2023). Intern Nursing Students’ Perceived Barriers to Providing End‑of‑Life Care for Dying Cancer Patients in a Death Taboo Cultural Context: A Qualitative Study. Asia‑Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(4), 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100210

Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Routledge Classics.

West, D. (2019). Action Habit as Imperative: Peirce´s Supreme Art. Southern Semiotic Review, 10, 1-22.

Xu, Y. (2007). Death and Dying in the Chinese Culture: Implications for Health Care Practice. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 19(5), 412-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822307301306

Yick, A. G. & Gupta, R. (2002). Chinese Cultural Dimensions of Death, Dying, and Bereavement: Focus Group Findings. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 9(2). 32-42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12226932/

Descargas

Publicado

10-10-2025

Cómo citar

Baron, G. B., & Song, H. (2025). Un viaje prolongado: Luto y resurrección digital en el contexto chino. InMediaciones De La Comunicación, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2025.20.2.4112

Número

Sección

Artículos temáticos