A participaçãoon-linena esfera pública. As ambiguidades do afeto.

Autores

  • Peter Dahlgren Lund University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.1.2824

Palavras-chave:

esferas públicas digitales, afecto y política, participación política, política en línea, compromiso cívico

Resumo

El punto de partida de este artículo consiste en la cre­ciente atención al afecto como aspecto importante de la participación política, en particular en el contexto del rol de los medios sociales en la democracia y en las esferas públicas. El abordaje recopila una amplia variedad de análisis e investigaciones sobre la participación, las esfe­ras públicas y el afecto, con el objetivo de destacar logros importantes, problemas y ambigüedades. Al abordar este grupo de temas relacionados, no encontramos un conjunto de conocimientos acumulativo y unificado, sino facetas de diversas tradiciones. Si bien esto puede presentar ciertas dificultades, al mismo tiempo puede alentarnos a reflexionar sobre nuestras propias premisas. La primera parte trata el concepto de participación. Allí se expone una visión estricta que considera a la parti­cipación como una intervención, por pequeña que sea, en las relaciones de poder. Mientras que en un segundo momento se explora la noción de afecto: se lo encuadra dentro del campo de fuerza de la racionalidad y la emo­cionalidad, las cuales han sido ideas centrales en la teoría de la democracia. La tercera parte del artículo se enfoca en el entorno en línea, en particular en los medios so­ciales, destacándose algunas de las ambivalencias persistentes en la participación en línea y su relevancia para el afecto. La parte final ofrece unas breves reflexiones sobre el afecto y el populismo, incluido el tema de los caminos públicos legítimos hacia el conocimiento.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Aiken, M. (2017). The Cyber Effect. York: Random House.

Alexander, J., Breese, E. & Luengo, M. (edits.) (2016). The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: From Technology to Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Alvares, C. & Dahlgren, P. (2016). Populism, extremism, and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain. European Journal of Communication, 31, 46-57.

Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How Too Much Information is Changing the Way we Think and Know. Abingdon: Routledge.

Bakaedjieva, M. (2015). Rationalizing sociality: an unfinished script for socialbots. The Information Society: An International Journal, 31, 244–256. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2015.1020197.

Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal Connections in the Digital Age 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brennan, G. & Lomasky, L. (1984). Democracy and Decision. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA y London: MIT Press.

Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. London: Junction.

Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect Publishers.

Carr, N. (2014). The Glass Cage: How Our Computers are Changing Us. New York: Norton.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Coleman, S. (2014), How Voters Feel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Couldry, N. (2014). The myth of ‘us’: digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 235-249.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (eds.) (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 608-626.

Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2016). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Couldry, N., Livingstone, S. & Markham, T. (2010). Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Basingstoke: Intellect.

Crary, J. (2013). 24/7 Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso.

Dahlberg, L. (2014). The Habermasian public sphere and exclusion: an engagement with poststructuralist-influenced critics. Communication Theory, 24(1), 21-41.

Dahlgren, P. (2013). The Political Web: Participation, Media, and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Effler, E. (2010). Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes: Emotional Rhythms in Social Movement Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elliott, A. (2008). Concepts of the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fenton, N. (2016). Digital, Political, Radical. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fernández-Armesto, F. (2010). Truth: A History and Guide for the Perplexed. London: Black Swan.

Franklin, M.I. (2013). Digital Dilemmas: Power, Resistance, and the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frosh, S. (2011). Feelings. Abingdon: Routledge.

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: An Introduction. London: Sage.

Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Verso.

Gilroy-Ware, M. (2017). Filling the Void: Emotion, Capitalism and Social Media. London: Repeater Books.

Gladwell, M. (2010).Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. New Yorker, 4 de octubre. Retrieved: 27/2/2015. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell

Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (eds.) (2010).The Affect Theory Reader. North Carolina: Duke University Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hall, C. (2005). The Trouble with Passion: Political Theory Beyond the Reign of Reason. New York: Routledge.

Harris, M. (2014).The End of Absence: Reclaiming What We’ve Lost in a World of Constant Connection. New York: ACTUAL/Penguin.

Harvey, D. (1991). The Condition of Post-Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge: Polity.

Highfield, T. (2016). Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. London: Routledge.

Lundby, K. (ed.) (2014). Mediatization of Communication: Handbooks of Communication Science, 21. Berlín: De Gruter Mouton.

Lunt, P. y Livingstone, S. (2016). Is mediatization the new paradigm for our field? Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462-470.

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.

Margetts, H., Scott, P. & Yasseri, T. (2016). Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Marichal, J. (2013). Political Facebook groups: Micro-activism and the digital front stage. First Monday, 18(12). Retrieved: 22/1/2017 Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4653/3800

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

McGuigan, J. 2016). Neoliberal Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. London: Allen Lane.

Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

Mudde, C. & Kalhausser, C. (2017). Populism: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Müller, J.W. (2016). What is Populism? Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies. London: Zero Books.

Negt, O. & Kluge. A. (1993). The Public Sphere and Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction. En F. Panizza, F. (ed.). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 1-31). London: Verso.

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment and the New Political. New York: Oxford University Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Towards new journalism(s):affective news, hybridity, and liminal spaces. Journalism Studies, 16(1), 27-40.

Pettman, D. (2106). Infinite Distraction: Paying Attention to Social Media. Cambridge: Polity.

Phelan, S. (2014). Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Phillips, W. &Milner, R. (2017). The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Storsul, T. (2014). Deliberation or self-presentation? Young people, politics and social media. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 17-28.

Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

Turner, G. (2002). British Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Virilio, P. (2000). The Information Bomb. London: Verso.

Wodak, R., Khosravinik, M. & Mral, B. (eds.) (2013). Right-Wing Populism in Europe:

Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.

Publicado

2018-07-02

Como Citar

Dahlgren, P. (2018). A participaçãoon-linena esfera pública. As ambiguidades do afeto. InMediaciones De La Comunicación, 13(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.1.2824

Edição

Seção

Artigos