Propriedades de agência de doutorandos em processos de pesquisa durante a pandemia da COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2024.15.2.3739Palavras-chave:
envolvimento do aluno, COVID-19, doutoramento, estudantes de doutorado, teseResumo
A complexidade da formação doutoral exige a articulação de diferentes aspectos pessoais e contextuais. Neste processo, o desenvolvimento da agência estudantil assume especial relevância, particularmente em situações disruptivas que afetam diversas áreas da vida, como a acadêmica e a pessoal. O objetivo principal deste estudo foi analisar as propriedades da agência dos doutorandos no desenvolvimento de estratégias para abordar a leitura e a escrita acadêmicas e a aprendizagem e o aproveitamento do processo de pesquisa na contingência sanitária da COVID-19. Utilizando uma abordagem qualitativa, foram selecionados 26 estudantes de diferentes programas de doutorado de uma universidade mexicana, que demonstraram implementar estratégias com senso de agência para o desenvolvimento de suas pesquisas de doutorado. A análise das informações obtidas foi realizada por meio da teoria fundamentada. No que diz respeito à leitura, escrita, aprendizagem e otimização do trabalho de pesquisa, os resultados revelam que os processos de agência dos doutorandos concretizaram-se em estratégias centradas na gestão do conhecimento e da informação, no gerenciamento do espaço e do tempo e na interação com o diretor da tese. O texto aborda esses processos, bem como a relevância de promover o desenvolvimento da agência de programas de doutorado a partir de uma formação integral (acadêmica, pessoal, ética, entre outras) que permite enfrentar os desafios dos cenários atuais e futuros.
Downloads
Referências
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid–19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
AlQashouti, N., Yaqot, M., Franzoi, R. E., & Menezes, B. C. (2023). Educational System Resilience during the COVID–19 Pandemic Review and Perspective. Education Sciences, 13(9), 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090902
Andrade, D., Ribeiro, I. J., & Máté, O. (2023). Academic burnout among master and doctoral students during the COVID–19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4745.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2006). Hacia una psicología de la agencia humana. Perspectivas de la ciencia psicológica, 1(2), 164–180.
Bukko, D., & Dhesi, J. (2021). Doctoral students living, leading, and learning during a pandemic. Impacting Education. Journal of Transforming Professional Practice, 6(2), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2021.167
Carrera, C., Madrigal, J., & Lara, Y. (2017). La formación de investigadores en los posgrados. Una reflexión curricular. Revista Boletín Redipe, 6(9), 53–72.
Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Corcelles, M. (2013). Learning to Write a Research Article: Ph.D. Students' Transitions toward Disciplinary Writing Regulation, Research in the Teaching of English, 47(4), 442–447.
Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., González–Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). Positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions, Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1602596
Corner, S., Pyhältö, K., Peltonen, J., & Löfström, E. (2021). Interest, burnout and drop–out intentions among Finnish and Danish humanities and social sciences PhD. students, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 593–609. https://doi.org/10.28945/4867
Donohue, W. J., Lee, A. S. J., Simpson, S., & Vacek, K. (2021). Impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic on doctoral students’ thesis/dissertation progress. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.28945/4818
Elliot, D. L. (2021). A ‘doctoral compass’: strategic reflection, self-assessment and recalibration for navigating the ‘twin’ doctoral journey. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1652–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1946033
González–Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). Research on Doctoral Supervision: What We Have Learnt in the Last 10 Years. En T. M. Machin, M. Clarà & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Traversing the doctorate: reflections and strategies from students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 117–141). Palgrave Macmillan.
Huang, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). How to motivate student engagement in emergency online learning? Evidence from the COVID–19 situation. Higher Education, 85(5), 1101–1123.
Ives, B. (2021). University students experience the COVID–19 induced shift to remote instruction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 59.
Kee, C. E. (2021). The impact of COVID–19: Graduate students’ emotional and psychological experiences. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 31(1–4), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1855285
Kokotsaki, D. (2023). What does it mean to be a resilient student? An explorative study of doctoral students’ resilience and coping strategies using grounded theory as the analytic lens. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 18, 173–198. https://doi.org/10.28945/5137
Lokhtina, I. A., Castelló, M., Lambrechts, A. A., Löfström, E., McGinn, M. K., Skakni, I., & van der Weijden, I. (2022). The impact of the COVID–19 pandemic on early career researcher activity, development, career, and well–being: the state of the art. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 13(3), 245–265.
McAlpine, L. (2012). Shining a light on doctoral reading: implications for doctoral identities and pedagogies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728875
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey, Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927378
McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., & Turner, G. (2014). Identity–trajectory: Reframing early career academic experience. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 952–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3123
McAlpine, L., Castelló, M., & Pyhältö, K. (2020). What influences PhD graduate trajectories during the degree: a research–based policy agenda. Higher Education, 80, 1011–1043.
Moore, R. L., & Wang, C. (2021). Influence of learner motivational dispositions on MOOC completion. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 121–124.
Omar, H. A., Ali, E. M., & Belbase, S. (2021). Graduate students’ experience and academic achievements with online learning during COVID–19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), 13055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313055
Ortiz Lefort, V. (2010). Los procesos de formación y desarrollo de investigadores en la Universidad de Guadalajara. Una aproximación multidimensional. Editorial CUCSH–UDG.
Ortiz Lefort, V., Pérez, R., Quevedo, L., & Maisterra, O. (2015). Una mirada analítica a las políticas de investigación científica en México: su orientación hacia la universidad pública. Revista Cubana de la Educación Superior, 34(1), 44–59.
Rivera–Pérez, C. (2021). Efecto de la pandemia en los estudiantes de posgrado en México. Invdes.
Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jiménez, E. (1996). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Aljibe.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students Completion, Achievement, and Well–Being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388.
Syahril, Janna, S. R., & Fatimah (2021). The Academic Stress of Final–Year Students in Covid–19 Pandemic Era. AL–ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.407
Vitae (2010). Realising the Potential of Researchers. The Vitae Researcher Development Framework. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-vitae.pdf
Zanotto, M., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2023, 4–8 de diciembre). Los apoyos de las instituciones de educación superior a la función pedagógica de la dirección de tesis doctorales [Ponencia]. XVII Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco.
Zanotto, M., Gaeta, M. L., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2021, 15–19 de noviembre). La función pedagógica de la dirección de tesis doctorales: un análisis desde las prácticas que la constituyen [Ponencia]. XVI Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa, Puebla, México.
Zanotto, M., Gaeta, M. L., & Rodríguez, M. S. (2023). La dirección de tesis desde la percepción de las y los doctorandos: aportes al avance investigativo. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 28(96), 305–331.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
