Testimonial tweeting. People’s voice (and eyes) on anti-impeachment protests in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.1.2834Keywords:
Dilma Rousseff, impeachment, Twitter, social appropriation, social movementsAbstract
Though the idea of horizontal networked, bottom-up communication processes is present in many discussions of the role of digital media in the context of social movements, not many studies point to the processes behind the creation and publication of authorial testimonial content by regular people, that is, content produced in situ at the heat of the moment whose author is neither media nor political actors. Through 10 interviews structured according to Proulx and colleagues’ ICT social appropriation framework (2017), with users that have created and published such type of content on Twitter with the hashtag #ForaTemer in the aftermath of Rousseff’s impeachment in Brazil in 2016.
This paper discusses why and how ordinary people take media matters in their own hands as a form of political action, even though it may apparently be dressed up with different communicative functions, such as emulating the pretense neutrality and objectivity of media discourse. Findings point to a convergent media critique as main motivator, followed by the aim to connect the absent and to scrutinize police abuse. The aggregated result seems to point to a manifestation of collective intelligence, characterized by swarm-like logics and alienation from the complete result of the #ForaTemer publications.
Research funded by CONICYT-PCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2016-21160426.
Downloads
References
Albuquerque, A. (2012). On Models and Margins: Comparing media models viewed from a Brazilian perspective. In Hallin, D. & Mancini, P. (Eds.) Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (pp. 72-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Albuquerque, A. (November 4, 2017) Protecting democracy or conspiring against it? Media and politics in Latin America: A glimpse from Brazil. Journalism, 1-18. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917738376.
Allan, S. (2007) Citizen Journalism and the Rise of “Mass Self-Communication”: Reporting the London Bombings. Global Media Journal-Australian Edition. 1 (1).
Bastos, M. T. & Mercea, D. (2015). Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat. New Media & Society, 1-20. DOI: 1461444815584764.
Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, 25-27 de Agosto de 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik.
Chauí, M. (2006). Simulacro e poder: uma análise da mídia. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Ordinary witnessing in post-television news: Towards a new moral imagination. Critical discourse studies, 7(4), 305-319.
Condeza, R., Santos, M. L. B., Lizama, A. & Vásquez, P. (2016) Chile. In Activismo Político en Tiempos de Internet, Sorj, B. & Fausto, B. (Coords.). São Paulo: Edições Plataforma Democrática.
De Moraes, D. (2009). A batalha da mídia: governos progressistas e políticas de comunicação na América Latina e outros ensaios. Rio de Janeiro: Pão e Rosas.
DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive. Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-146.
Di Felice, M. (2013). Ser redes: o formismo digital dos movimentos net-ativistas. MATRIZes, 7(2), 49-71.
Dylko, I., & McCluskey, M. (2012). Media Effects in an Era of Rapid Technological Transformation: A Case of User-Generated Content and Political Participation. Communication Theory, 22(3), 250-278.
Eveland, W. P. (2003). A ‘‘mix of attributes’’ approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395-410.
Ganesh, S. & Stohl, C. (2013). From Wall Street to Wellington: Protests in an era of digital ubiquity. Communication Monographs, 80(4), 425-451.
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12 (3), pp. 347-364.
Goodman, A. (may 17, 2016) Noam Chomsky: Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff impeached by a Gang of Thieves. Interview with the author via Democracy Now! Retrieved: 26/07/2017. Available at: http://www.democracynow.org/2016/5/17/ noam_chomsky_brazils_president_dilma_rousseff
Guerrero, M. A. & Márquez-Ramírez, M. (2004). The Captured-Liberal Model: Media Systems, Journalism and Communication Policies in Latin America. The International Journal of Hispanic Media (7), 1-12.
Harrison, T. M. & Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding new media in Web 2.0: exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media & Society, 11(1-2), 155-178.
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., y Roberts, B. (1982). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herman, E. S. & Chomsky, N. (2010). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Random House.
Isaac, H., Besseyre Des Horts, C.H. & Leclercq, A. (2006). Adoption and appropriation: toward a new theoretical framework. An exploratory research on mobile technologies in french companies. HAL Archives Ouvertes
Jinkings, I., Doria, K. & Cleto, M. (orgs.) (2016). Por que gritamos golpe. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
Juris, J. S. (2004). Networked social movements: global movements for global justice. Castells, M (ed.). The Network Society: a Cross-cultural Perspective (pp. 341-362). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Kammer, A. (2013). Audience participation in the production of online news: towards a typology. NORDICOM Review: Nordic Research on Media and Communication, 34, 113-127.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-34). California: Sage.
Kucinsky, B. (1998). A síndrome da antena parabólica: ética no jornalismo brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Lemos, A. (2015). A crítica da crítica essencialista da cibercultura. MATRIZes, 9(1), 29-51.
Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New media & society, 11(8), 1327-1347.
Lindtner, S., Anderson, K. & Dourish, P. (February, 2012). Cultural appropriation: information technologies as sites of transnational imagination. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 77-86). ACM.
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New media & society, 10(3), 393-411.
Löwy, M. (2016). Da tragedia à farsa: o golpe de 2016 no Brasil. Jinkings, I., Doria, K. y Cleto, M. (orgs.) Por que gritamos golpe. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
Mazzeto, L. (May 23, 2017). Com 120 milhões de usuários, WhatsApp vive momento crucial no Brasil. IDG Now. Retrieved: 24/08/2017. Available at: http://idgnow. com.br/internet/2017/05/31/com-120-milhoes-de-usuarios-whatsapp-vive-momento-crucial-no-brasil/
Ortellado, P., Solano, E. & Moretto, M. (2016) Uma sociedade polarizada? Jinkings, I., Doria, K. & Cleto, M. (orgs.), Por que gritamos golpe. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
Östman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1004-1021.
Park, N.; Kee, K. F. & Valenzuela, S. (December, 2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 12(6), 729-733. DOI: 10.1089/ cpb.2009.0003.
Pantti, M. (2013). Getting closer? Encounters of the national media with global images. Journalism Studies, 14(2), 201-218.
Peirce, C. S. (2003). Semiótica. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva.
Peters, J. D. (2001). Witnessing. Media, Culture & Society, 23(6), 707-723.
Polydoro, F. S. (2016). Videos Amadores de Acontecimentos: Realismo, evidência e política na cultura visual contemporânea (Doctoral dissertation). Escola de Comunicação e Artes, Universidade de São Paulo.
Proulx, S., Lecomte, N. & Rueff, J. (2007). Une appropriation communautaire des technologies numériques de l’information. Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie. Available at: https://depot.erudit.org/id/001199dd
Rafail, P. (2017). Nonprobability Sampling and Twitter: Strategies for Semibounded and Bounded Populations. Social Science Computer Review. DOI: 0894439317709431.
Reading, A. (2009). Mobile witnessing: Ethics and the camera phone in the war on terror. Globalizations, 6(1), 61-76. DOI: 10.1080/14747730802692435.
Reyes G., P. (2015). Internet Social en Chile: Una etnografía de la apropiación de TIC. Santiago: RiL Editores.
Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology. The New Media in Society. Nueva York: Free Press.
Santaella, L. (1983). O que é Semiótica. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Santaella, L. (1992). A Assinatura das Coisas. Rio de Janeiro: Imago Editora.
Sey, A. & Castells, M. (2004). From media politics to networked politics: The Internet and the political process. Castells, M. (ed.). The Network Society: a Cross-cultural Perspective (pp. 363-381). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Silverstone, R. (2004) Media literacy and media civics. Media, Culture and Society, 26(3), 473-482.
Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society, 10(1), 139-157. DOI: 10.1177/1461444807085325
Valenzuela, S. (2012). La protesta en la era de Facebook: Manifestaciones juveniles y uso de redes sociales en Chile 2009-2011. Scherman, A. (ed.), Jóvenes, participación y medios 2011 (pp. 20-29). Santiago de Chile: Centro de Investigación y Publicaciones de la Facultad de Comunicación y Letras de la Universidad Diego Portales.
Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, culture, and society, 31(1), 41-58.
Wardle, C. & Williams, A. (2010). Beyond user-generated content: a production study examining the ways in which UGC is used at the BBC. Media, culture, and society, 32(5), 781-803.
Wardle, C., Dubberley, S. & Brown, P. D. (2014) Amateur Footage: A Global Study of User-Generated Content. Retrieved: 03/10/2017 Available at: https:// academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:2v6wwpzgnj
Wahl-Jorgensen, K., Williams, A. & Wardle, C. (2010). Audience views on user-generated content- exploring the value of news from the bottom up. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 8(1), 177-194.
Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361-373.
Williams, A., Wardle, C. & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2011). Have they got news for us? Audience revolution or business as usual at the BBC? Journalism Practice, 5(1), 85-99.
Wunsch-Vincent, S. & Vickery, G. (September 28, 2007). Participative Web and user– created content: Web 2.0, wikis and social networking. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
