This is an outdated version published on 2020-11-20. Read the most recent version.

Communication is not what it seems

Revisiting its ground

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2020.15.2.3008

Keywords:

communication, human exchanges, practices, social organizations

Abstract

From etymological and philosophical perspectives, this article revisits the deep meaning of communication, taking into account what the word in itself implies to value how it shapes our ways of relating to one another and with the world.  The author’s arguments, intertwined with those of a variety of thinkers, dismantles the linear authoritarian transmission model of communication and places it in the gap, that is, in the in-between one and others where the endless construction of possible meaning takes place. The interpretations that arise from these thoughts encourage the understanding of our daily practices and open questions to rethink the decision-making of those who carry out communication tasks in the varied universe of social organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mariluz Restrepo, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Doctora en Filosofía, Arte y Pensamiento Crítico, European Graduate School (Suiza). Magister en Filosofía, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia). Profesora Emérita, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Investigadora, docente y consultora en comunicación y análisis organizacional, cultura contemporánea, educación, semiótica y hermenéutica para universidades y organizaciones de América Latina, España y Estados Unidos. Su trayectoria docente y de investigación sobre las problemáticas contemporáneas de la representación, la sensibilidad, el arte, la educación y la comunicación ha sido enriquecida por las obras de varios pensadores tales como Charles Peirce, Paul Ricœur, Michel Serres, Jacques Derrida y Jean-Luc Nancy, entre otros. Autora de decenas de artículos y varios libros, entre los cuales figuran: 32 Notas en taller, 2017; Representación, relación tríadica en el pensamiento de Charles S. Peirce, 2010; y WEB, un paradigma de comunicación, 2006

References

Braun, H. (2018). La Nación Sentida, Colombia, 1949: El país se busca en sus palabras. Bogotá: Penguin-Random House.

Davis, D. (2010). Inessential Solidarity. Rhetoric and Foreigner Relations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Eco, U. (1982). ¿El público perjudica a la televisión? En M. de Moragas Spa (eds.), Sociología de la comunicación de masas (pp. 286-303). Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili.

Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Levinas, E. (1987 [1974]). De otro modo que ser, o más allá de la esencia. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme.

Levinas, E. (2011 [1961]). Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Nancy. J-L. (2005 [2003]). Forbidden Representation. In The Ground of the Image (pp. 27-50). New York: Fordham University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2008 [1986]). Preface. In The Inoperative Community (pp. xxxvi-xxxli). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2008a [1986]). The Inoperative Community. In The Inoperative Community (pp. 1-42). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2008b [1986]). Myth Interrupted. In The Inoperative Community (pp. 43-70). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2013 [2001]). The ‘There Is’ of Sexual Relation. In Corpus II Writings on Sexuality (pp. 1-22). New York: Fordham University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1935). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1-6. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press. (Edited by C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss).

Peirce, C. S. (1958). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 7-8. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press. (Edited by A. Burks).

Peirce, C. S. (1982-1999). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition. Vols. 1-6. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Edited by Nathan Houser & others).

Restrepo, M. (2010). Representación, relación triádica en el pensamiento de C.S. Peirce. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Serres, M. (1970). El mensajero. En Estructuralismo y epistemología (s/p). Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-20

Versions

How to Cite

Restrepo, M. (2020). Communication is not what it seems: Revisiting its ground. InMediaciones De La Comunicación, 15(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2020.15.2.3008

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.