Predominant culture and subcultures
The Go Galápagos Company study through the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2020.15.2.3024Keywords:
corporate culture, subculture, predominant culture, internal communicationAbstract
The article presents the results of an empirical academic work that had as a study model the Scoring the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument proposed by Cameron and Quinn. It aims to account for the state of corporate culture in the Ecuadorian company Go Galápagos, in order to identify which is the predominant culture and also spot the existence of subcultures within the organization. The study follows the premise of several authors, Joan Costa, Cameron and Quinn, among others, who stat that when a company is geographically dispersed, the predominant culture tends to be devided into small subcultures. The case of the Go Galápagos company allows us to verify this theory, since being divided into Quito (administrative area) and Galápagos (its largest vessel), the central culture is fragmented and the appearance of sub cultures is evident. The application of this study revealed that the company maintains a hierarchical culture; however, in certain areas it presents the existence of strongly consolidated subcultures. In this article not only the results of this study are analyzed, but also the reasons why these subcultures emerge.
Downloads
References
Cameron, K. & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnóstico y cambios de la cultura organizacional. Editorial: Addison–Wesley, Series Organization.
Cameron, K. & Quinn, R. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. EEUU: Jossey-Bass.
Capriotti Peri, P. (2009). Branding corporativo. Fundamentos para la gestión estratégica de identidad corporativa. Santiago de Chile: Colección de Libros de la Empresa.
Costa, J. (2012). El DirCom hoy. Barcelona: Costa Punto Com.
Cusot, G. (2018). Análisis de la cultura organizacional en Go Galápagos: Un análisis comparativo entre lo que sucede en las instalaciones land y en su embarcación Galápagos Legend. Tesis de doctorado. Universidad de Artes, Ciencias y Comunicación, Chile. Inédita.
Elias, J. & Mascaray, J. (2003). Más allá de la comunicación interna. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
Lessem, R. (1992). Gestión de la cultura corporativa. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos.
Martínez, A. P. & Facal, A. (2016). Tomando el pulso. Aplicabilidad del instrumento de Cameron y Quinn en instituciones de salud del sector público de Uruguay. Jornadas Académicas de la Facultad de Ciencias Económica y de Administración, Universidad de la República, Uruguay. Recuperado de: http://www.fcea.edu.uy/Jornadas_Academicas/2016/Ponencias/Administracion/Tomando%20el%20Pulso%20Picon%20-%20Rodriguez.pdf
Robbins, N. (2004). La cultura empresarial y liderazgo. Barcelona: Editorial Plaza & Janes.
Salazar, A. (2008). Estudio de la cultura organizacional según Cameron y Quinn: el caso de una empresa del sector asegurador venezolano. Tesis en Relaciones Industriales –orientación Recursos Humanos–, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Venezuela. Recuperado de: http://biblioteca2.ucab.edu.ve/anexos/biblioteca/marc/texto/AAR5070.pdf
Suárez, A. (2008). Auditoría de Comunicación. Buenos Aires: DIRCOM.
Wudarzewski, G. (2018). Validation of Cameron and Quinn’s Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) in Polish conditions. Journal of management and economics, 6(1), 79-105.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-05-10 (3)
- 2020-12-07 (2)
- 2020-11-20 (1)